For eight years in the 1990s, Attorney Charles Ware hosted the extremely popular legal advice radio program "The Lawyer's Mailbox"; the Number One (#1)legal advice radio program in the Mid-Atlantic Region,on WEAA - 88.9 FM, Morgan State University Radio in Baltimore, Maryland.
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

DUI FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS ("FSTs") ARE INACCURATE : MARYLAND "BEST 10" DUI ATTORNEY[AIDUIA]

www.charlesjeromeware.com              "Here to make a Difference."
Premier DUI defense attorney Charles Jerome Ware is Maryland-based and nationally-respected by his many clients and legal peers for his successful legal representation in DUI and DWI cases. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact DUI and DWI defense attorney Charles Ware at (410) 720-6129 or (410) 730-5016. He can help you.

DUI field sobriety tests ("FSTs") are inaccurate. A key reason FSTs are inaccurate is because they are "subjective" in nature, and subject to the whims, mood, competence, capability, attitude, training, agenda and fairness of the police officer administering the tests or interpreting the results.

Beginning in the 1970s, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)conducted research into the possible development of a series or battery of so-called "standardized field sobriety tests" (SFSTs). The goal was to develop and use these tests to make it easier for police to detect and arrest drunk drivers.

Six(6) tests were used in the initial stages of the research:
1. The Walk-and-Turn (WAT) Test
2. The One-Legged Stand (OLS) Test
3. The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test
4. The Finger-to-Nose Test
5. The Finger Counting Test (Thumb and Finger)
6. The Drawing on Paper Test

Eventually, these tests were narrowed to the following general standard three (3):
1. The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test
2. The Walk and Turn Test
3. The one-Legged Stand Test

They are all subjective in results and consequently can be very inaccurate.

No comments:

Post a Comment