For eight years in the 1990s, Attorney Charles Ware hosted the extremely popular legal advice radio program "The Lawyer's Mailbox"; the Number One (#1)legal advice radio program in the Mid-Atlantic Region,on WEAA - 88.9 FM, Morgan State University Radio in Baltimore, Maryland.
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

Saturday, December 16, 2017

CHARLES WARE'S TOP 12 MARYLAND, D.C,. AND U.S.SUPREME COURT DUI CASES : A PRIMER

www.charlesjeromeware.com           "Here to make a difference."

Maryland and District of Columbia premier DUI and DWI defense attorney Charles Ware has selected 12 top Maryland Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and U. S. Supreme Court DUI cases for consideration concerning drunk driving law.

For a free initial consultation with Attorney Charles Ware, you are invited to call him at (410) 720-6129  or  (410) 730-5016. He and his professional staff are willing to consider your case and help you. Call us.

CHARLES WARE'S TOP 12 MARYLAND, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND U.S.      SUPREME COURT DUI CASES : A PRIMER :

                                               MARYLAND
1. Motor Vehicle Administration v. April Marie Deering, Maryland Court of Appeals, No. 52, September Term, 2013, Decided May 21, 2014.

Decision:  A driver who is stopped by a police officer on suspicion of drunk driving, who is asked to take a breath test (breathalyzer) under the "implied consent administrative  per se law', and whose license is administratively suspended under that law as a result of an adverse test result or a refusal to take the test is not entitled to have the suspension set aside on the ground that the driver was not permitted to consult counsel when deciding whether to take the test.

                                          DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
2. Reynard Eaglin v. District of Columbia, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 14-CT-279, Decided August 27, 2015.

Decision :  Appellant Eaglin  was found guilty of DUI in the District of Columbia and given an "enhanced sentence" of jail time, pursuant to D.C. Code Section 50-2206.13, as an individual who the court decided qualified for such as a result of a "prior offense" of DUI in Maryland. Apparently there was no dispute that Mr. Eaglin had "pled guilty" to a prior DUI in Maryland. The Court concluded that Mr. Eaglin's plea of guilty to DUI in a different jurisdiction (Maryland) rendered him a "prior offender" under D.C. Code Section 50-2206.13.

                                    UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

3. Missouri v. McNeely, 596 U.S. ____ (2013).
4. South Dakota v. Neville, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).
5. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582 (1990).
6. Michigan v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).
7. Blanton v. North Las Vegas, 489 v. 538 (1989).
8. California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984).
9. Bell v. Burson,, 402 U.S. 535 (1971).
10. Schmerber v. California,, 384 U.S. 757 (1966).
11. Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952).
12. Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952).

[ For cases 3 to 12, also review  California attorney and author Lawrence Taylor's " Top 10 U.S. Supreme Court DUI cases "]

No comments:

Post a Comment