For eight years in the 1990s, Attorney Charles Ware hosted the extremely popular legal advice radio program "The Lawyer's Mailbox"; the Number One (#1)legal advice radio program in the Mid-Atlantic Region,on WEAA - 88.9 FM, Morgan State University Radio in Baltimore, Maryland.
www.CharlesJeromeWare.com

Thursday, October 22, 2015

"DDD" - DRUNK DRIVING DEFENDANT : HO. CO. MARYLAND " BEST DUI ATTORNEY"[AIDUIA-Certified]

www.charlesjeromeware.com                   " Here to make a Difference."


Premier defense attorney Charles Jerome Ware is Maryland-based, nationally recognized and respected, and ranked by his many clients as well as his legal peers as one of the "BEST 10 DUI and DWI" Defense Attorneys in the State of Maryland [AIDUIA-Certified]. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact him at (410) 720-6129.  He can help you.


Drunk driving laws in Maryland, as in other states, can be complicated. It is certainly very serious. A DUI or DWI conviction can adversely affect not only one's personal, but even more so a person's professional life and career. For example, generally a DUI or DWI conviction cannot be expunged from a person's criminal and traffic record. At my firm, we take these cases very seriously.  We suggest you do so as well.


A driver charged with DUI (Driving Under the Influence) or DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) has a few different options,  should he or she choose to mount a defense. Almost invariably, these defenses will involve some form of attack on the arresting officer's actions --- or inactions.   While Maryland is not the worst state to get a drunk driving charge in (the worst is probably Arizona), it is certainly not the best either. It is strongly recommended that a driver charged with DUI or DWI not self-represent themselves in this state.


A few common DUI and DWI defenses in Maryland are:


(1) The "stop" by police of the driver was improper.
(2) Administration by the police officer of the field sobriety tests (FSTs) was improper; resulting in inaccurate conclusions.
(3) Administration of the portable breath test (breathalyzer) was improperly done; resulting in inaccurate results.
(4) Administration of the standard breathalyzer test was improper; resulting in inaccurate results.
(5) Administration of the blood alcohol test, including the chain of custody of the blood, was improper; rendering inaccurate results.


No comments:

Post a Comment