Saturday, September 14, 2013
The Lawyer's Mailbox: LOS MEJORES CONSEJOS Y SECRETOS PARA GANAR LOS CAS...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: LOS MEJORES CONSEJOS Y SECRETOS PARA GANAR LOS CAS...: QUINCE (15) CONSEJOS PARA GANAR CASOS DEL INMIGRACION, por Abogado Charles Jerome Ware, www.charlesjeromeware.com , Ex Juez de Inmigracion...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHAP. 13 : DARK SECRETS OF CREDIT CARDS AND DEBIT ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHAP. 13 : DARK SECRETS OF CREDIT CARDS AND DEBIT ...: " 'Electronic money' " is dangerous because, for the most part, it is invisible money." from page 138, Chapter 13, &...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHAPTER 4 : FIRST LEGAL LOTTERIES IN THE UNITED ST...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHAPTER 4 : FIRST LEGAL LOTTERIES IN THE UNITED ST...: " FIRST LEGAL LOTTERIES IN THE UNITED STATES ", page 38, Chapter 4 (Lotteries In The United States), from the best-selling book, ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: USA v. ANDRES LOPEZ-CRUZ - "POLICE DECEPTION AND T...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: USA v. ANDRES LOPEZ-CRUZ - "POLICE DECEPTION AND T...: www.charlesjeromeware.com ( We fight. You win.). Maryland and Wasington, D.C. Representation. In this federal case involving the U. S...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: USA v. ANDRES LOPEZ-CRUZ - "POLICE DECEPTION AND T...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: USA v. ANDRES LOPEZ-CRUZ - "POLICE DECEPTION AND T...: www.charlesjeromeware.com ( We fight. You win.). Maryland and Wasington, D.C. Representation. In this federal case involving the U. S...
USA v. ANDRES LOPEZ-CRUZ - "POLICE DECEPTION AND TRICKERY", NO.11-50551 ,9TH US CT. OF APPEALS, 09-12-2013.
www.charlesjeromeware.com ( We fight. You win.). Maryland and Wasington, D.C. Representation.
In this federal case involving the U. S. Border Patrol in San Diego County, California, the 9th Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals ruled on September 12th, 2013 that even if a defendant gave a law enforcement office consent to search his cellphone, the officer does not have the right to answer the defendant's calls and pretend to be the defendant. Such actions by the law enforcement officer are in violation of the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
[see, USAv. Andres Lopez-Cruz, No. 11-50551, 9th Cir. U.S. Court of Appeals (09-12-2013);
http://thelawyersmailbox.blogspot.com/"Charles Ware's Maryland Criminal Law Update: Police Deception & Trickery"; www.abajournal.com/news/article/September 13, 2013/Stephanie Ward/ "Officers Can't Answer Your Phonr And Impersonate You, 9th Corcuit says Regarding Cell Phone Search"; www.charlesjeromeware.com]
In this federal case involving the U. S. Border Patrol in San Diego County, California, the 9th Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals ruled on September 12th, 2013 that even if a defendant gave a law enforcement office consent to search his cellphone, the officer does not have the right to answer the defendant's calls and pretend to be the defendant. Such actions by the law enforcement officer are in violation of the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
[see, USAv. Andres Lopez-Cruz, No. 11-50551, 9th Cir. U.S. Court of Appeals (09-12-2013);
http://thelawyersmailbox.blogspot.com/"Charles Ware's Maryland Criminal Law Update: Police Deception & Trickery"; www.abajournal.com/news/article/September 13, 2013/Stephanie Ward/ "Officers Can't Answer Your Phonr And Impersonate You, 9th Corcuit says Regarding Cell Phone Search"; www.charlesjeromeware.com]
CHARLES WARE'S MARYLAND CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE :" POLICE DECEPTION & TRICKERY", www.charlesjeromeware.com
The 9th Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals has ruled that law enforcement officers do not have the right to answer a defendant's telephone call and pretend to be the defendant, even if the defendant consented to the officer searching the defendant's cellphone. [United States of America v. Andres Lopez-Cruz, No. 11-50551 (Septemcer 12, 2013)]
The defendant, Andres Lopez-Cruz, was stopped by a U.S. Border Patrol agent near the San Diego County, California - Mexico border. After informing the agent that the two cellphones in his vehicle's console belonged to friends, Lopez-Cruz then agreed to the agent's request to search the cellphones.
One of the cellphones rang, and the agent answered it. The agent-officer did not seek defendant Lopez-Cruz's. permission, but he initiated a conversation with the caller while pretending to be Lopez-Cruz.
As a direct result of the information he received from the incriminating conversation he had with the caller, the agent and his agent colleagues were able to make arrests and, inter alia, charge Lopez-Cruz with conspiracy to pick-up and transport undocumented immigrants from Mexico. [www.abajournal.com/news/article/ " Officer Can't Answer Your Phone And Impersonate You, 9th Circuit Says Regarding Cell Phone Search"/ September 13th, 2013/ Stephanies Francis Ward]
The Court effectively suppressed all evidence received by way of the cellphone conversation, as it was gathered in violation of the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, inter alia.
The national law office of Charles Jerome Ware, P. A., Attorneys & Counsellors, is nationally-respected and renowned for its successful defense in numerous criminal cases . The firm is headquartered conveniently in the greater Baltimore, Maryland -Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. www.charlesjeromeware.com.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
The defendant, Andres Lopez-Cruz, was stopped by a U.S. Border Patrol agent near the San Diego County, California - Mexico border. After informing the agent that the two cellphones in his vehicle's console belonged to friends, Lopez-Cruz then agreed to the agent's request to search the cellphones.
One of the cellphones rang, and the agent answered it. The agent-officer did not seek defendant Lopez-Cruz's. permission, but he initiated a conversation with the caller while pretending to be Lopez-Cruz.
As a direct result of the information he received from the incriminating conversation he had with the caller, the agent and his agent colleagues were able to make arrests and, inter alia, charge Lopez-Cruz with conspiracy to pick-up and transport undocumented immigrants from Mexico. [www.abajournal.com/news/article/ " Officer Can't Answer Your Phone And Impersonate You, 9th Circuit Says Regarding Cell Phone Search"/ September 13th, 2013/ Stephanies Francis Ward]
The Court effectively suppressed all evidence received by way of the cellphone conversation, as it was gathered in violation of the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, inter alia.
The national law office of Charles Jerome Ware, P. A., Attorneys & Counsellors, is nationally-respected and renowned for its successful defense in numerous criminal cases . The firm is headquartered conveniently in the greater Baltimore, Maryland -Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. www.charlesjeromeware.com.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)