Saturday, May 31, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: BLACK FARMER LAWYERS : MARYLAND's CHARLES WARE, ww...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: BLACK FARMER LAWYERS : MARYLAND's CHARLES WARE, ww...: www.charlesjeromeware.com " Here to make a difference" for America's Black farmers. Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys a...
BLACK FARMER LAWYERS : MARYLAND's CHARLES WARE, www.charlesjeromeware.com
www.charlesjeromeware.com " Here to make a difference" for America's Black farmers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national boutique law firm which, inter alia, provides successful legal representation for Black farmers in Maryland and throughout the United States. The firm's law practices areas of expertise include class-action cases
( including the Pickford class-action settlement), civil cases, criminal defense, personal injury, medical and dental malpractice, wrongful death, estates and trusts, immigration, discrimination, employment, contracts, etc.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact the firm at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national boutique law firm which, inter alia, provides successful legal representation for Black farmers in Maryland and throughout the United States. The firm's law practices areas of expertise include class-action cases
( including the Pickford class-action settlement), civil cases, criminal defense, personal injury, medical and dental malpractice, wrongful death, estates and trusts, immigration, discrimination, employment, contracts, etc.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact the firm at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Friday, May 30, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND AUTO/CAR SAFETY ATTORNEYS/LAWYERS CENTER:...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND AUTO/CAR SAFETY ATTORNEYS/LAWYERS CENTER:...: This MARYLAND AUTO/CAR SAFETY ATTORNEYS/LAWYERS CENTER " Airbag Safety System Report " is presented as a public service by the M...
MARYLAND AUTO/CAR SAFETY ATTORNEYS/LAWYERS CENTER: Airbag Safety System Report
This MARYLAND AUTO/CAR SAFETY ATTORNEYS/LAWYERS CENTER " Airbag Safety
System Report " is presented as a public service by the Maryland-based national automobile personal injury and wrongful death law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors, LLC. This information is not intended to be legal advice. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
We are " here to make a difference".
Automobile Engineering Expert Witness Discusses Side Airbag Safety System In Car Accident.
This factual scenario involves side airbag safety systems in a double fatality car accident..
The victims were traveling in a 10 year-old truck along a rural highway at 2 a.m. when a vehicle coming in the opposite direction at high speed crossed the center line, striking the driver's side front fender of the truck. The impact caused the truck to lift into the air. The other car then struck the left rear wheel with enough force to dislodge the axle. The truck then flipped onto the driver's side and onto the truck occupants who had been thrown from the driver's window.
Families of the two victims sued the other driver as well as themanufacturer of the truck for negligence and wrongful death.
Against the truck manufacturer, the plaintiffs allege that the ejection of the two victims was the primary cause of the deaths and that they could have been prevented from ejection(and death) if the truck had been equipped with safety features such as a side curtain air bag and window glazing, both of which were available as early as five years before the truck was manufactured. The family of of the passenger victim also sued the truck driver for negligence, as he had been drinking and could have avoided the deadly collision.
Questions for the Expert Witness:
1. Did similar vehicles at the time incorporate side curtain airbags ? Answer : Yes.
2. Could the truck in this case have included such a safety feature ? Answer : Yes.
ANSWERS:
With a comparison having been done of other vehicles by other manufacturers with similar pillar and roof structures, this automobile engineering expert concludes there is no reason that the vehicle at issue could not have been equipped with a side airbag inflatable curtain (SABIC) system. Other vehicles produced by the truck manufacturer were equipped with an inflatable tubular stricter (ITS)
system.
Testing on those vehicles two years before the truck in this case was produced documented the ejection mitigation value of the ITS. The testing was performed with unrestrained occupants. There were no ejections in the roll-over testing. Computer modeling demonstrated without the ITS system, the occupants would have been ejected. This confirms that this ITS system could have been installed on the subject truck, was tested, and proven to prevent the ejection of unrestrained occupants in a similar platform.
[ www.theexpertinstitute.com/case-studies/automobile-engineering/May 19, 2014/Morgenstern]
System Report " is presented as a public service by the Maryland-based national automobile personal injury and wrongful death law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys and Counselors, LLC. This information is not intended to be legal advice. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
We are " here to make a difference".
Automobile Engineering Expert Witness Discusses Side Airbag Safety System In Car Accident.
This factual scenario involves side airbag safety systems in a double fatality car accident..
The victims were traveling in a 10 year-old truck along a rural highway at 2 a.m. when a vehicle coming in the opposite direction at high speed crossed the center line, striking the driver's side front fender of the truck. The impact caused the truck to lift into the air. The other car then struck the left rear wheel with enough force to dislodge the axle. The truck then flipped onto the driver's side and onto the truck occupants who had been thrown from the driver's window.
Families of the two victims sued the other driver as well as themanufacturer of the truck for negligence and wrongful death.
Against the truck manufacturer, the plaintiffs allege that the ejection of the two victims was the primary cause of the deaths and that they could have been prevented from ejection(and death) if the truck had been equipped with safety features such as a side curtain air bag and window glazing, both of which were available as early as five years before the truck was manufactured. The family of of the passenger victim also sued the truck driver for negligence, as he had been drinking and could have avoided the deadly collision.
Questions for the Expert Witness:
1. Did similar vehicles at the time incorporate side curtain airbags ? Answer : Yes.
2. Could the truck in this case have included such a safety feature ? Answer : Yes.
ANSWERS:
With a comparison having been done of other vehicles by other manufacturers with similar pillar and roof structures, this automobile engineering expert concludes there is no reason that the vehicle at issue could not have been equipped with a side airbag inflatable curtain (SABIC) system. Other vehicles produced by the truck manufacturer were equipped with an inflatable tubular stricter (ITS)
system.
Testing on those vehicles two years before the truck in this case was produced documented the ejection mitigation value of the ITS. The testing was performed with unrestrained occupants. There were no ejections in the roll-over testing. Computer modeling demonstrated without the ITS system, the occupants would have been ejected. This confirms that this ITS system could have been installed on the subject truck, was tested, and proven to prevent the ejection of unrestrained occupants in a similar platform.
[ www.theexpertinstitute.com/case-studies/automobile-engineering/May 19, 2014/Morgenstern]
Thursday, May 29, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND PHARMACEUTICAL MALPRACTICE : PRESCRIPTION...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: MARYLAND PHARMACEUTICAL MALPRACTICE : PRESCRIPTION...: www.charlesjeromeware.com . "Here to make a difference". Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-b...
MARYLAND PHARMACEUTICAL MALPRACTICE : PRESCRIPTION DRUGS UPDATE
www.charlesjeromeware.com. "Here to make a difference".
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national drug personal injury and wrongful death law firm. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Pharmaceutical malpractice (pharmaceutical negligence) lawsuits are among the fastest-growing types of personal injury (tort) lawsuits in the United States today. This evidences that there is legal recourse when medicine harms someone.
Pharmaceutical (Drug) malpractice is very common in Maryland and elsewhere in America, and the core or foundation for these lawsuits is prescription medication. These cases are commonly based on (1) drug recalls, (2) product failure, (3) long-term side effects of prescription drugs, (4) improperly -prescribed medication, and (5) improperly-filled prescriptions.
A credible 2002 study found:
Dosage errors in hospitals accounted for 20% of all U.S hospital prescriptions; and
Potentially harmful errors to patients occurred in about 40% of all U.S. hospital prescriptions.
A credible 2003 study found:
The prescription error rate intercepted by pharmacists in the U.S. was 40%; and
The potential minimum number of patients harmed by prescription drugs in the U.S. was
417,908.
Some reasons why "drug recalls" are so common in the U.S. today include:
- Increased pressure for profits (profit motive) and need for medical relief causes "rushed"
production and marketing of drugs;
- Long-term side-effects are difficult to determine; and
- There is a "conflict of interest' in the process of testing drugs, since the "testing" is usually done by the drugs' manufacturers who are under pressure to rush the drugs to market.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national drug personal injury and wrongful death law firm. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Pharmaceutical malpractice (pharmaceutical negligence) lawsuits are among the fastest-growing types of personal injury (tort) lawsuits in the United States today. This evidences that there is legal recourse when medicine harms someone.
Pharmaceutical (Drug) malpractice is very common in Maryland and elsewhere in America, and the core or foundation for these lawsuits is prescription medication. These cases are commonly based on (1) drug recalls, (2) product failure, (3) long-term side effects of prescription drugs, (4) improperly -prescribed medication, and (5) improperly-filled prescriptions.
A credible 2002 study found:
Dosage errors in hospitals accounted for 20% of all U.S hospital prescriptions; and
Potentially harmful errors to patients occurred in about 40% of all U.S. hospital prescriptions.
A credible 2003 study found:
The prescription error rate intercepted by pharmacists in the U.S. was 40%; and
The potential minimum number of patients harmed by prescription drugs in the U.S. was
417,908.
Some reasons why "drug recalls" are so common in the U.S. today include:
- Increased pressure for profits (profit motive) and need for medical relief causes "rushed"
production and marketing of drugs;
- Long-term side-effects are difficult to determine; and
- There is a "conflict of interest' in the process of testing drugs, since the "testing" is usually done by the drugs' manufacturers who are under pressure to rush the drugs to market.
Monday, May 26, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: THE DAILY RECORD, "Law Day 2006": Maryland Lawyer...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: THE DAILY RECORD, "Law Day 2006": Maryland Lawyer...: "Law Day" Article in THE DAILY RECORD , May 1, 2006, page 7, written by Daily Record Legal Affairs writer Daniel Ostrovsky, on t...
THE DAILY RECORD, "Law Day 2006": Maryland Lawyer Charles J. Ware
"Law Day" Article in THE DAILY RECORD, May 1, 2006, page 7, written by Daily Record Legal Affairs writer Daniel Ostrovsky, on the legal and political issue, " What's the biggest threat to checks and balances today?"
ANSWER of Attorney Charles J. Ware : " Single-Party Control ".
" Charles J. Ware, a lawyer based in Columbia, has had first-hand experience with the separation of powers doctrine.
Among other things, the 1975 Howard University Law School graduate has worked at
the U. S. Department of Justice, was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for Maryland and the Eastern
District of Virginia, served as a special counsel to a former chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, and was the youngest immigration judge (IJ) in U.S. history ...." < see more >
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
ANSWER of Attorney Charles J. Ware : " Single-Party Control ".
" Charles J. Ware, a lawyer based in Columbia, has had first-hand experience with the separation of powers doctrine.
Among other things, the 1975 Howard University Law School graduate has worked at
the U. S. Department of Justice, was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for Maryland and the Eastern
District of Virginia, served as a special counsel to a former chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, and was the youngest immigration judge (IJ) in U.S. history ...." < see more >
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY/ROTATOR CUFF SURGERY : Mary...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY/ROTATOR CUFF SURGERY : Mary...: www.charlesjeromeware.com . "Here to make a difference." Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based ...
BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY/ROTATOR CUFF SURGERY : Maryland Attorney Charles Ware
www.charlesjeromeware.com. "Here to make a difference."
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Brachial Plexus Injury Post Rotator Cuff Surgery: The case presented.
Case Overview:
The plaintiff/patient had right rotator cuff surgery on November 28, 2012. Her right brachial plexus nerve bundle was stretched during the surgery. She is now unable to participate in her ADL's since she's right-handed. The EMG studies show some improvement in her conduction studies, but functionally her right hand is still unable to work properly. She has shooting pains in her right upper extremity and her fingers that ranges from 5 - 10 and averages 7.
Issue:
Is it malpractice to receive a stretch injury to the right brachial plexus nerve during a right rotator cuff surgery ?
Expert opinions:
Not necessarily. Generally, most likely there should be an intervening negligent event that occurred during the surgery in order to have a malpractice issue.
[medQuest, 05/22/2014/curbside counsel]
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Brachial Plexus Injury Post Rotator Cuff Surgery: The case presented.
Case Overview:
The plaintiff/patient had right rotator cuff surgery on November 28, 2012. Her right brachial plexus nerve bundle was stretched during the surgery. She is now unable to participate in her ADL's since she's right-handed. The EMG studies show some improvement in her conduction studies, but functionally her right hand is still unable to work properly. She has shooting pains in her right upper extremity and her fingers that ranges from 5 - 10 and averages 7.
Issue:
Is it malpractice to receive a stretch injury to the right brachial plexus nerve during a right rotator cuff surgery ?
Expert opinions:
Not necessarily. Generally, most likely there should be an intervening negligent event that occurred during the surgery in order to have a malpractice issue.
[medQuest, 05/22/2014/curbside counsel]
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: ANESTHESIOLOGY NEGLIGENCE : JVRA via MARYLAND ATTY...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: ANESTHESIOLOGY NEGLIGENCE : JVRA via MARYLAND ATTY...: www.charlesjeromeware.com " Here to make a difference." The Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of ...
ANESTHESIOLOGY NEGLIGENCE : JVRA via MARYLAND ATTY. CHARLES WARE
www.charlesjeromeware.com " Here to make a difference."
The Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of victims of medical negligence without the United States. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
$ 2,000,000.00 Confidential Settlement/Recovery During Trial of Case: Anesthesiology Malpractice; Negligence by anesthesiologist in maintaining airway in 50-year-old male patient with cervical and facial fractures and difficult intubation history; Anoxic brain injury to patient.
The 50-year-old plaintiff patient alleged the defendants were negligent in failing to properly maintain his airway during surgery. The plaintiff suffered from a history of difficult intubation as well as multiple cervical and facial fractures. The plaintiff/patient was extubated prematurely and not properly monitored resulting in severe anoxic brain injury. Defendant anesthesiologist and surgical facility denied any malpractice and argued that the plaintiff was properly monitored.
The case was settled during trial for $ 2,000,000.00.
[JVRA; http://www.jvra.com/verdict-trak/article:aspx/Mass.,191000/2014/]
The Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of victims of medical negligence without the United States. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at www.charlesjeromeware.com, charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
$ 2,000,000.00 Confidential Settlement/Recovery During Trial of Case: Anesthesiology Malpractice; Negligence by anesthesiologist in maintaining airway in 50-year-old male patient with cervical and facial fractures and difficult intubation history; Anoxic brain injury to patient.
The 50-year-old plaintiff patient alleged the defendants were negligent in failing to properly maintain his airway during surgery. The plaintiff suffered from a history of difficult intubation as well as multiple cervical and facial fractures. The plaintiff/patient was extubated prematurely and not properly monitored resulting in severe anoxic brain injury. Defendant anesthesiologist and surgical facility denied any malpractice and argued that the plaintiff was properly monitored.
The case was settled during trial for $ 2,000,000.00.
[JVRA; http://www.jvra.com/verdict-trak/article:aspx/Mass.,191000/2014/]
Monday, May 19, 2014
TOP MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWYERS IN MARYLAND & D.C. : Atty. Chaqrles Jerome Ware
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by Maryland and the nation's leading providers of information on top medical malpractice lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national medical malpractice law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by Maryland and the nation's leading providers of information on top medical malpractice lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
TOP MARYLAND LAWYERS: Attorney Charles Jerome Ware
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference ".
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national boutique law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national boutique law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
TOP LEAD PAINT DEFENSE LAWYER IN MARYLAND & D.C.: Charles Jerome Ware
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland and D.C.-based national lead-paint defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lead-paint defense attorneys.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland and D.C.-based national lead-paint defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lead-paint defense attorneys.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
TOP WRONGFUL DEATH LAWYERS IN AMERICA : Maryland Attorney Charles Jerome Ware
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal in the Maryland-based national boutique and wrongful death law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal in the Maryland-based national boutique and wrongful death law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by the nation's leading providers of information on top lawyers.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
MOST INFLUENTIAL LAWYERS IN MARYLAND: CHARLES JEROME WARE
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national boutique law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by Maryland and the nation's leading providers of information on the most influential lawyers in America.
Attorney Charles Ware is a founding principal of the Maryland-based national boutique law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC.
One Thousand Century Plaza Building
10630 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 113
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 730-5016
(410) 720-6129
www.charlesjeromeware.com
Attorney Charles Ware has been peer-nominated and selected by Maryland and the nation's leading providers of information on the most influential lawyers in America.
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
MARYLAND CORAM NOBIS AND HABEAS CORPUS LEGAL REMEDIES ,www.charlesjeromeware.com
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national criminal defense law firm which is highly-regarded and well-respected for its many successful representations of clients with criminal and civil issues and difficulties. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
1. Writ of Coram Nobis
Maryland Rule 15-1201, 12-202, et. seq.; Parker v. State, 160 Md. App. 672 (2005); Skok v. State, 361 Md. 52 (2000).
In recent years, an increasing harshness of the immigration laws as well as the federal sentencing guidelines have inspired defense attorneys to seek creative ways to revisit semmingly final judgments in criminal cases. Maryland state appellate courts have ruled that the use of one such device --- the Writ of Coram Nobis --- is an appropriate method for an individual to challenge a conviction on constitutional, jurisdictional, or fundamental grounds, even long after the judgment has become final.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals in Parker, relying on the Court of Appeals decision in Skok, clearly affirmed that the writ of coram nobis is an acceptable remedy " for a person who is not incarcerated and not on parole or probation, who is faced with a significant collateral consequence of his or her conviction, and who can legitimately challenge the conviction on constitutional or fundamental grounds." < see more .
2. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maryland Courts & Judicial Proceedings, Annotated Code, Section 3-702; Lomax v. Maryland Correctional Training Center, 356 Md. 569 (1999); Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of Review, 358 Md. 656 (2000).
Anyone committed, detained, confined, or restrained for any offense under color of law may file a petition for writ oh habeas corpus. Habeas corpus actions are appropriate when the relief sought is release, but also when the relief sought is a proceeding or hearing which may lead to the petitioner's release.
Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is a Maryland-based national criminal defense law firm which is highly-regarded and well-respected for its many successful representations of clients with criminal and civil issues and difficulties. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
1. Writ of Coram Nobis
Maryland Rule 15-1201, 12-202, et. seq.; Parker v. State, 160 Md. App. 672 (2005); Skok v. State, 361 Md. 52 (2000).
In recent years, an increasing harshness of the immigration laws as well as the federal sentencing guidelines have inspired defense attorneys to seek creative ways to revisit semmingly final judgments in criminal cases. Maryland state appellate courts have ruled that the use of one such device --- the Writ of Coram Nobis --- is an appropriate method for an individual to challenge a conviction on constitutional, jurisdictional, or fundamental grounds, even long after the judgment has become final.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals in Parker, relying on the Court of Appeals decision in Skok, clearly affirmed that the writ of coram nobis is an acceptable remedy " for a person who is not incarcerated and not on parole or probation, who is faced with a significant collateral consequence of his or her conviction, and who can legitimately challenge the conviction on constitutional or fundamental grounds." < see more .
2. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maryland Courts & Judicial Proceedings, Annotated Code, Section 3-702; Lomax v. Maryland Correctional Training Center, 356 Md. 569 (1999); Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of Review, 358 Md. 656 (2000).
Anyone committed, detained, confined, or restrained for any offense under color of law may file a petition for writ oh habeas corpus. Habeas corpus actions are appropriate when the relief sought is release, but also when the relief sought is a proceeding or hearing which may lead to the petitioner's release.
MARYLAND MOLD LITIGATION LAWYERS ("MMLL") : CASE UPDATE
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
The Maryland-based national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of Maryland and D.C. clients.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
There has been a recent increase in litigation ( including class action litigation) on the issue of mold -risk from wet-application cellulose insulation that should have been disclosed to home buyers. At least one potential class-action has been filed on behalf of all individuals and consumers who purchased new homes in 2003 that contained wet-blown cellulose insulation. The suit alleges that the insulation is defective and does not meet appropriate building standards.
The presence of wet spray insulation installed with moisture into closed wall cavities would materially affect the value of homes at the time of sale because moist and wet spray material in wall cavities raises the perception of moisture trapped inside the walls and the related dangers of mold and other water damage issues.
[ http:// theexpertinstitute.com/case-studies/real-estate-witness-discusses-mold.../May 12, 2014]
The Maryland-based national law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of Maryland and D.C. clients.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
There has been a recent increase in litigation ( including class action litigation) on the issue of mold -risk from wet-application cellulose insulation that should have been disclosed to home buyers. At least one potential class-action has been filed on behalf of all individuals and consumers who purchased new homes in 2003 that contained wet-blown cellulose insulation. The suit alleges that the insulation is defective and does not meet appropriate building standards.
The presence of wet spray insulation installed with moisture into closed wall cavities would materially affect the value of homes at the time of sale because moist and wet spray material in wall cavities raises the perception of moisture trapped inside the walls and the related dangers of mold and other water damage issues.
[ http:// theexpertinstitute.com/case-studies/real-estate-witness-discusses-mold.../May 12, 2014]
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
BALTIMORE LAWYER'S GUIDE TO LEAD POISONING DEFENSE
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
The Maryland-based national lead-paint poisoning defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of defendants in lead-based paint poisoning cases. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
For the most part, interior lead-based paint has not been manufactured in the United States in about fifty or so years. The problem in Baltimore and several other urban and rural geographic areas is lead-based paint use in many pre-1978 built residential units. However, lead poisoning is preventable.
MAINTENANCE is the key. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that lead-based paint, when it is well-maintained and intact, typically poses no health risk. When lead-based paint was manufactured, it was sought after because it was washable and durable --- and it was recommended and even required by Federal and state governments for government housing projects and other buildings. In 1955, lead paint manufacturers eliminated the marketing of lead-based interior paint.
For Baltimore residential unit landlords, we recommend the following, inter alia:
1. Treat any unit built before 1978 as though it does contain lead-based paint, unless a certified lead-risk professional has issued a written report stating that the entire property has been tested found to be lead-free.
2. Formally inform the potential renter or purchaser of the unit that the possibility of lead paint exists. Pursuant to the Federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act ( aka TITLE 10), which was enacted to protect families from exposure to lead from paint, dust, and soil, disclosure l
The Maryland-based national lead-paint poisoning defense law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, is highly-regarded and well-respected for its successful representation of defendants in lead-based paint poisoning cases. For an initial courtesy consultation, contact us at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
For the most part, interior lead-based paint has not been manufactured in the United States in about fifty or so years. The problem in Baltimore and several other urban and rural geographic areas is lead-based paint use in many pre-1978 built residential units. However, lead poisoning is preventable.
MAINTENANCE is the key. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that lead-based paint, when it is well-maintained and intact, typically poses no health risk. When lead-based paint was manufactured, it was sought after because it was washable and durable --- and it was recommended and even required by Federal and state governments for government housing projects and other buildings. In 1955, lead paint manufacturers eliminated the marketing of lead-based interior paint.
For Baltimore residential unit landlords, we recommend the following, inter alia:
1. Treat any unit built before 1978 as though it does contain lead-based paint, unless a certified lead-risk professional has issued a written report stating that the entire property has been tested found to be lead-free.
2. Formally inform the potential renter or purchaser of the unit that the possibility of lead paint exists. Pursuant to the Federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act ( aka TITLE 10), which was enacted to protect families from exposure to lead from paint, dust, and soil, disclosure l
Thursday, May 1, 2014
The Lawyer's Mailbox: 2014 MARYLAND EMPLOYMENT LAW BOOT CAMP,www.charles...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: 2014 MARYLAND EMPLOYMENT LAW BOOT CAMP,www.charles...: www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference". The " 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp", presente...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: 2014 MARYLAND EMPLOYMENT LAW BOOT CAMP,www.charles...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: 2014 MARYLAND EMPLOYMENT LAW BOOT CAMP,www.charles...: www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference". The " 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp", presente...
2014 MARYLAND EMPLOYMENT LAW BOOT CAMP,www.charlesjeromeware.com
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
The " 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp", presented by the Maryland-based national employment law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, will be held in the Bahamas at the Paradise Island Resort, on Friday, May 16, 2014. For more information, contact Charles Ware at (410) 730-5019.
Program at a Glance: Presented in interesting and interactive fashion by knowledgeable professionals, the program will provide employment law training and management techniques for
supervisors and managers, as well as human resource personnel and business owners. Avoidance of, and success in, employment lawsuits are the goals.
It is our premise that an employer's most powerful weapon for avoiding employment lawsuits is a well-trained supervisor or manager. Business owners who want to improve their bottom financial line should be aware of this fact.
The 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp will feature important employment and discrimination law topics all employers need to know, including: (1) how to handle issues of discrimination, harassment ill and injured employees, COBRA and healthcare reform, employee discipline, employee evaluation, overtime pay, immigration law issues, attorney-client privilege in employment disputes, effective internal investigations, worker accomodations, et al.
The " 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp", presented by the Maryland-based national employment law firm of Charles Jerome Ware, Attorneys & Counselors, LLC, will be held in the Bahamas at the Paradise Island Resort, on Friday, May 16, 2014. For more information, contact Charles Ware at (410) 730-5019.
Program at a Glance: Presented in interesting and interactive fashion by knowledgeable professionals, the program will provide employment law training and management techniques for
supervisors and managers, as well as human resource personnel and business owners. Avoidance of, and success in, employment lawsuits are the goals.
It is our premise that an employer's most powerful weapon for avoiding employment lawsuits is a well-trained supervisor or manager. Business owners who want to improve their bottom financial line should be aware of this fact.
The 2014 Maryland Employment Law Boot Camp will feature important employment and discrimination law topics all employers need to know, including: (1) how to handle issues of discrimination, harassment ill and injured employees, COBRA and healthcare reform, employee discipline, employee evaluation, overtime pay, immigration law issues, attorney-client privilege in employment disputes, effective internal investigations, worker accomodations, et al.
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHARLES WARE : AMONG MARYLAND's " 10 BEST DUI/DWI ...
The Lawyer's Mailbox: CHARLES WARE : AMONG MARYLAND's " 10 BEST DUI/DWI ...: www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference". Attorney Charles Ware is ranked among "Maryland's 10 Best DUI...
CHARLES WARE : AMONG MARYLAND's " 10 BEST DUI/DWI ATTORNEYS", www.charlesjeromeware.com
www.charlesjeromeware.com "Here to make a difference".
Attorney Charles Ware is ranked among "Maryland's 10 Best DUI/DWI Attorneys" by the American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys (AIDUIA). This prestigious rating includes opinions of his DUI and DWI clients as well as his peers.
Attorney Ware has achieved unparalleled success on behalf of, and for the benefit of, his clients.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Attorney Charles Ware is ranked among "Maryland's 10 Best DUI/DWI Attorneys" by the American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys (AIDUIA). This prestigious rating includes opinions of his DUI and DWI clients as well as his peers.
Attorney Ware has achieved unparalleled success on behalf of, and for the benefit of, his clients.
For an initial courtesy consultation, contact Attorney Ware at charlesjeromeware@msn.com, (410) 730-5016 or (410) 720-6129.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)